Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Phish12's avatar

I have a nickel allergy, so all of my watches are either titanium or precious metal. Although more expensive than SS, I couldn’t be happier with how many incredible pieces I’ve been able to acquire. For titanium pieces, I own the Rolex YM II (which I wear way more than I thought I would when I first bought it!), the Vacheron Constantin Overseas Cardinal Points North (which has become my weekend adventure watch), and a Blancpain Fifty Fathoms 42.3mm (which you omitted, but should consider as it wears great and is a treat to look at). I hope Patek (titanium Aquanaut!!!) and others will get on board or expand offerings because titanium watches are fantastic!

Brad Tucker's avatar

I’m one of those who prefer titanium and wish it were more widely offered. The Swiss watch industry, in particular, is slow to adapt/change (for many reasons). One trope that has held on in watches is the notion that heft = luxury. Mass equating to gravitas has long been a justification for the almost exclusive use of precious metals in watch cases. The introduction of steel in luxury watches was revolutionary and iconoclastic when AP released the Royal Oak back in 1972, and one could argue that steel didn’t become a primary luxury metal until over 40 years later.

Other than Richard Mille, few watchmakers trumpet light weight as a benefit or advance in wristwatches. This is an exception in the world of big boy hobbies that involve machines. From bicycles to cars to aircraft to sports equipment, lightweight, high strength materials represent higher value/cost options.

Hopefully, the Swiss watch industry will, at its usual glacial pace, embrace Titanium for its many benefits and make it widely available, preferably without a huge pricing premium (that, of course, is a whole ‘nother discussion).

14 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?